Editorial Feature

Using Laser Beams to Drive a Billion Electron Volts in 3.3 Centimeters

ImageForArticle_99_15832520714349163.png

Image Credit: Doug McLean/Shutterstock.com

Updated on 03/03/20 by Ben Pilkington

In a precedent-shattering demonstration of the potential of laser-wakefield acceleration, scientists at the United States Department of Energy's (DOE’s) Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, working with colleagues at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom, have accelerated electron beams to energies exceeding a billion electron volts (1 GeV) in a distance of just 3.3 centimeters. The researchers reported their results in a 2008 issue of Nature Physics.

Introduction

By comparison, SLAC, the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, boosts electrons to 50 GeV over a distance of 3.2 km (two miles) with radiofrequency cavities whose accelerating electric fields are limited to about 20 million volts per meter.

The electric field of a plasma wave driven by a laser pulse can reach 100 billion volts per meter, making it possible for the Berkeley Lab group and their University of Oxford collaborators to achieve 1/50 of SLAC's beam energy in just 1/100,000 of SLAC's length.

This is only the first step, says Wim Leemans of Berkeley Lab's Accelerator and Fusion Research Division (AFRD). "Billion-electron-volt beams from laser-wakefield accelerators open the way to very compact high-energy experiments and superbright free-electron lasers."

Channeling a Path to Billion-Volt Beams

In the fall of 2004, Leemans’s group LOASIS (Laser Optics and Accelerator Systems Integrated Studies) was one of three groups to report reaching peak energies of 70 to 200 MeV (million electron volts) with laser wakefields, accelerating bunches of tightly focused electrons with nearly uniform energies.

While the other groups employed large laser spot sizes and 30 terawatts (TW, or one trillion watts) laser pulses, the LOASIS "igniter-heater" approach was quite different. LOASIS drove a plasma channel through a plume of hydrogen gas with one laser pulse, heated and shaped the channel with a second pulse, and created the accelerating wave with a third pulse at a relatively modest 9 TW.

Formation of Plasma

In all such techniques plasma is formed by heating the hydrogen gas enough to disintegrate its atoms into their constituent protons and electrons. A laser pulse traveling through this plasma creates a wake in which bunches of free electrons are trapped and ride along, much like wakeboarders riding the wake of a big ship.

The Dephasing Length

After propagating for a distance known as the "dephasing length", the electrons outrun the wake. This limits how far they can be accelerated and thus limits their energy. To increase the dephasing lengt, the plasma density must be lowered, but at the same time the collimation of the laser beam must be maintained over the longer distance.

One way to do this is to increase the spot size of the laser beam, since this reduces diffraction.

The trouble with this approach is that if you double the size of the spot, you have to quadruple the laser power just to maintain the same intensity over the area of the spot.

Wim Leemans, Accelerator and Fusion Research Division, Berkeley Lab

 

Increasing spot size enough to achieve 1 GeV beams would require petawatt lasers (1000 TW).

 

 "The more powerful the laser, the more expensive and cumbersome," he says. "Plus it takes the laser a lot longer to charge up, which limits its pulse repetition rate."

 

Problems with Big Spot Sizes

Big spot sizes are problematic in themselves.

There’s the risk of increased electron emittance, meaning the beam spreads out and becomes hard to focus. Free-electron lasers are one of the most promising applications for laser-wakefield accelerators, but they depend on all the electrons in the beam being uniformly in phase. Low emittance beams are essential for free-electron lasers.

Wim Leemans, Accelerator and Fusion Research Division, Berkeley Lab

The alternate way to increase the acceleration length is to provide a guide channel for the drive-laser pulse that creates the plasma wakefield. In the 2004 experiments, the LOASIS group did this by driving a wire-thin channel of plasma through a plume of hydrogen gas with an igniter pulse. When heated by a separate laser pulse, the plasma expanded inside the channel so that its density was near-vacuum in the center but much higher near the walls. As an optical fiber, the channel served to guide and shape the pulse from the drive laser for distances up to two millimeters, although this technique too has its limitations.

Using Low-Density Plasma to Extend the Dephasing Length

Because of inefficient heating, laser-formed channels only work in dense plasmas. To extend the dephasing length much beyond two millimeters you need lower-density plasmas. So many researchers in the field thought the only way to reach higher beam energies was to use larger spot sizes and much more powerful lasers.

Wim Leemans, Accelerator and Fusion Research Division, Berkeley Lab

Leemans says the manifest advantages of channel guiding – higher-intensity pulses from lower-power lasers, yielding coherent, tightly focused beams with little energy spread – were strong incentives for the Berkeley Lab group to continue with the channel approach.

Sapphires and Capacitors

At the University of Oxford, Leemans met Simon Hooker, whose group had been studying plasma channel guides and their application to driving x-ray lasers and plasma accelerators for several years. Hooker showed Leemans a capillary channel guide carved into sapphire.

Leemans asked how many laser shots the sapphire channel could take, and when Hooker told him, as many as you like, a collaboration was born.

In the recent experiments, Hooker and his group provided one of the University of Oxford waveguides and the expertise in using them for guiding high-intensity laser pulses, and Leemans and his group provided powerful lasers, engineering capabilities, and unique know-how in driving laser-wakefield accelerators in waveguides. "The time was ripe to bring the experience of these two groups together," Hooker notes.

In these experiments, the guide capillary consists of two half-channels cut into the face of matching sapphire blocks. When the blocks are joined face to face, the halves of the channel form a thin tube. Other tubes come in at right angles fore and aft, through which hydrogen gas flows, and then ectrodes are placed near each end of the capillary.

Turning Hydrogen Gas into Plasma

To turn the hydrogen gas within the capillary into a plasma, a capacitor discharges current through the capillary from electrode to electrode. Almost instantly the electric discharge heats the newly formed plasma, creating an optical-fiber-like channel inside the capillary, with low plasma density in the hot center and high density against the channel's cool sapphire walls.

As Hooker explains, "Each cross section of the channel acts like a positive lens, continually focusing the beam toward the center of the channel."

Not least of this system's advantages over heating a channel with a separate laser is cost, says Leemans: "A 1-joule capacitor is much cheaper than a 1-joule laser."

1 GeV in 3.3 Centimeters

After a brief, carefully timed delay, the drive pulse from a 40 TW laser generates an intense and powerful wake in the plasma, trapping bunches of free electrons and accelerating them to over 1 GeV within the capillary's 3.3 cm length.

Once the beam passes through the capillary, the researchers used a deflecting magnet and a 1 m wide phosphor screen to measure the beam's energy, energy spread, and divergence. With an acceleration path more than 15 times as long as the igniter-heater set-up reported in 2004 – the longest distance over which such intense laser pulses have ever been channeled – and with four times its peak laser power, the tightly focused electron bunches reached 1 GeV. Furthermore, electron energies within each bunch varied at most by 2.5 percent, and probably less. For the first time, a laser-driven accelerator reached the beam energies typically found in conventional synchrotrons and free-electron lasers.

Future Considerations

As impressive as this is, Leemans says there is still scope for much more development in this field:

"It's the tip of the iceberg. We are already working on injection [inserting an already energetic beam into an accelerating cavity] and staging [the handoff of an energetic beam from one capillary to the next and subsequently to others, until very high energy beams are achieved]. Brookhaven physicist Bill Weng has remarked that achieving staging in a laser wakefield accelerator would validate 25 years of DOE investment in this field."

Leemans's group and their collaborators look forward to the challenge with confidence:

"In DOE's Office of Science, the High Energy Physics office has asked us to look into what it would take to go to 10 GeV. We believe we can do that with an accelerator less than a meter long – although we'll probably need 30 meters' worth of laser path."

While it's been said that laser wakefield acceleration promises high-energy accelerators on a tabletop, the real thing may not be quite that small. However, laser wakefield acceleration does indeed promise electron accelerators potentially far more powerful than any existing machine, neatly tucked inside a small building.

Acknowledgment

"GeV electron beams from a cm-scale accelerator," by Wim P. Leemans, Bob Nagler, Anthony J. Gonsalves, Csaba Toth, Kei Nakamura, Cameron G. R. Geddes, Eric Esarey, Carl B. Schroeder, and Simon M. Hooker, was published in the October 2008 issue of Nature Physics.

Source

  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this article?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.