Editorial Feature

Optical Atomic Clock Could Provide More Accurate Definition of a Second

An international research project based at the Paris Observatory has developed an optical atomic clock based on strontium. The clock could lead to a new, more accurate definition of the second, improving on the accuracy and stability of existing atomic clocks.

This new optical clock is the latest in a line of ever-improving super accurate clocks. Our current time standards are set at specialist facilities like the Paris Observatory, and NIST in the USA, using a type of atomic clock called a caesium fountain.

This has been the standard for defining the length of an SI second since the 1960s, but various attempts have been made recently to create a clock which will generate a more accurate and more reliable standard.

Caesium-based atomic clocks rely on a transition between energy levels within the caesium atom which is triggered by microwave radiation. This produces a very precise signal with a well-known measureable frequency, which has a relative uncertainty factor of just 3 parts in 1016 (ten thousand million million) - clocks based on this standard frequency only lose a second every 100 million years.

This new atomic clock, reported in Nature Communications, replaces the microwave-range transition in caesium with an optical transition in strontium. Optical frequencies are tens of thousands times higher than those of microwave radiation, giving the strontium clock a correspondingly higher accuracy.

In the experiment at the Paris Observatory, two separate strontium clocks were shown to agree with each other perfectly within the range that the equipment was able to measure - giving a total uncertainty factor of under 1.5 in 1016. The two clocks also agreed with the three standard caesium atomic clocks at the Observatory, at least to the extent that the caesium clocks could measure.

Another type of caesium clock has been proposed, which would use an optical transition in a single caesium ion at it's standard. This could theoretically provide a relative uncertainty a full order of magnitude smaller than existing clocks.

However, because there are practical issues associated with building a clock around a single ion, and because measuring the average emission frequency from a larger sample of atoms is much more statistically robust, experts predict that this new strontium-based optical atomic clock is more likely to become the new standard.

Sources

Will Soutter

Written by

Will Soutter

Will has a B.Sc. in Chemistry from the University of Durham, and a M.Sc. in Green Chemistry from the University of York. Naturally, Will is our resident Chemistry expert but, a love of science and the internet makes Will the all-rounder of the team. In his spare time Will likes to play the drums, cook and brew cider.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Soutter, Will. (2019, April 18). Optical Atomic Clock Could Provide More Accurate Definition of a Second. AZoOptics. Retrieved on November 21, 2024 from https://www.azooptics.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=602.

  • MLA

    Soutter, Will. "Optical Atomic Clock Could Provide More Accurate Definition of a Second". AZoOptics. 21 November 2024. <https://www.azooptics.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=602>.

  • Chicago

    Soutter, Will. "Optical Atomic Clock Could Provide More Accurate Definition of a Second". AZoOptics. https://www.azooptics.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=602. (accessed November 21, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Soutter, Will. 2019. Optical Atomic Clock Could Provide More Accurate Definition of a Second. AZoOptics, viewed 21 November 2024, https://www.azooptics.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=602.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this article?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.